Airbus A380-800 vs Boeing 747-8
Side-by-side specs and an editorial comparison — fleet roles, economics, and the passenger experience.
| Spec | Airbus A380-800 | Boeing 747-8 |
|---|---|---|
| ICAO type | A388 | B748 |
| Manufacturer | Airbus | Boeing |
| Engines | 4 × Engine Alliance GP7200 or Rolls-Royce Trent 900 | 4 × General Electric GEnx-2B67 |
| Typical seating | 525 | 410 |
| Range | 8,000 nm | 7,730 nm |
| Cruise speed | Mach 0.85 | Mach 0.855 |
| MTOW | 575,000 kg | 447,700 kg |
| Length | 72.72 m | 76.3 m |
| Wingspan | 79.75 m | 68.4 m |
| First flight | 2005 | 2010 |
| Status | Production ended | Production ended |
How they compare
The Airbus A380-800 and Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental are the last of the great four-engine passenger jets, and both were conceived for the very top of the capacity ladder. The A380 is a full double-deck aircraft designed to move very large numbers of passengers between slot-constrained mega-hubs, a role it filled most visibly for a handful of major international carriers. The 747-8 Intercontinental, a modernized evolution of the iconic 747, kept the partial upper deck and famous nose profile; its passenger version found only a small number of airline customers and served as a flagship on select long-haul routes.
Economically, both aircraft are shaped by their four engines. They can offer competitive costs per seat when filled to high load factors, but that is precisely the challenge: they need consistently strong demand to justify their trip costs, and higher fuel prices pushed airlines toward more flexible twin-engine widebodies. The A380 carries more passengers than the 747-8I and spreads costs over a larger cabin, while the 747-8I offers somewhat lower capacity with a strong cargo lineage. Both have now ended production, reflecting how the market moved away from very large quads.
Passenger experience
For passengers, both are known for a smooth, quiet ride thanks to their size — turbulence that unsettles a smaller jet is barely felt. The A380's two full-length decks give it an unusually spacious feel, and its width leaves room for generous cabins, staircases and the premium features several operators installed; economy runs ten-abreast on the main deck but a roomier 2-4-2 on the upper deck, which is the connoisseur's choice. The 747-8I offers the character of its upper-deck cabin and nose section, prized by frequent flyers, with a ten-abreast main deck of its own. Cabin altitude and humidity on both are typical of their era rather than class-leading, so the comfort advantage comes mainly from sheer space and low noise. For the best seat on either, head upstairs to the upper deck; on the main deck, choose a window away from the central staircases and galleys.
The two jets represent a shared philosophy that the industry has largely set aside, yet each still makes sense in specific hands. The A380 suits carriers with dense, high-demand hub routes and the ability to fill it; the 747-8I appeals where its blend of capacity, cargo heritage, and iconic status fits. Neither is a general-purpose answer today, but both remain remarkable expressions of maximum-capacity air travel.
Comparisons are editorial and based on public specifications. Not for operational use.